Using the App
SOP Writing Simulator
Premium tool. Open from /training-dashboard → SOP Writing card (the dashboard uses the short label, without the "Simulator" suffix), or directly at /sop-writing-simulator.
SOPs are the backbone of every accredited pathology laboratory. This simulator teaches the structure, language, and document-control rules your SOPs must meet.
What it does
- Picks a topic (e.g. "FBC analyser daily start-up", "Sample reception triage", "Cold-chain validation")
- Walks you through drafting the SOP section by section using a guided form
- Validates your draft against the ISO 15189:2022 document control checklist
- Produces a final formatted SOP that you can export as DOCX or PDF
- Optionally peer-reviews your SOP via the AI assistant
SOP structure taught
- Title and unique identifier
- Purpose and scope
- Definitions and abbreviations
- Responsibilities — by role, not by name
- Equipment and materials
- Safety considerations — COSHH, ACDP, sharps, biosafety level
- Procedure — numbered, imperative-voice steps
- Quality control — IQC, EQA references
- Records — what must be retained, where, for how long
- References — internal SOPs, external standards, manufacturer IFUs
- Document control footer — version, effective date, review date, approver, document owner
Language conventions
- Imperative voice — "Add 50 µL of reagent A" not "Reagent A is added"
- Numbered steps — never bullets in the procedure section
- Avoid passive voice — direct accountability
- No clinical decisions in technical SOPs — those go in clinical protocols
- Cross-reference other SOPs by ID, not by description (so renaming doesn't break links)
Document-control validation
The simulator flags common SOP defects:
- Missing or unclear review date
- Undefined abbreviations
- "TBD" or placeholder text in a controlled document
- Steps that depend on tacit knowledge (e.g. "process as usual")
- Inconsistent version numbering between header and footer
Standards alignment
- ISO 15189:2022 clauses 5.2 (Document control) and 7.5 (Documentation of examination procedures)
- MHRA Good Documentation Practice (GDP) principles — ALCOA+
- UKAS TPS 70 expectations
- Your laboratory's local document-control SOP (you can upload it; the simulator will validate against it)
Bands and competency mapping
- Band 5 — contribute to SOP review, draft minor revisions
- Band 6 — draft new SOPs in own specialty, lead annual reviews
- Band 7 — service-wide SOP harmonisation, document-control system ownership
Completed SOPs (anonymised) are accepted as IBMS Specialist Portfolio evidence in the Quality Management and specialty-specific sections.
Common interview question themes
- "Walk me through how you would draft a new SOP for a new method"
- "What goes in the references section of an SOP?"
- "How do you handle a conflict between an SOP and the manufacturer's IFU?"
- "Describe a time you had to revise an SOP after a near-miss"